We need technology and teachers technology is a supplemental learning tool in the classroom there is a vast amount of discussion and debates surrounding the education technology movement education technology has changed the way we think, communicate, and share knowledge across the world. I do not think that there is anyway that computers could simply replace teachers in the sense that a computer would teach a lesson without any teacher around at least this is true in literature and the social sciences this is true because a computer can never lead a discussion and respond in intelligent ways to student questions. Debate on should computers replace teachers motion i agree that some aspects of the educational system are already provided by the computer and yes, it is definitely true that you don't need a person to learn everything - education is a largely personal matter.
Robots can't provide the same helpful, passionate experiences that human teachers can and do today robots will teach only objective views and not allow students to develop their own views and beliefs. As a forever teachers, my personal and immediate answer is no we cannot replace an effective teacher with a computer teachers touch lives in ways that are immeasurable teachers make students laugh, encourage academic passion, mentor, and for some, they are a support system teachers are the eyes that keep many kids safe, the ears that listen to stories and the hand that holds when preschoolers learn to cross the street.
Once we make all teachers robots you wont have messy problems that put your school on the news in a bad way when your teacher sleeps with their students ttp://shavedlongcock blogspot com by saying that computers cannot replace teachers i meant that computers cannot replace good teachers. Will computers replace schoolteachers but computers won't replace teachers who are more than experts spouting facts, he says they can instantly explore points of confusion, then return to. Computers can definitely help students in a big way to learn similarly they can help teachers in teaching more effectively but computers can never replace teachers completely to begin with teachers are needed to decide and tell computer software developers what the computers will teach and how they will teach it.
Computers will never completely replace teachers, especially not for the younger grades where social interaction cannot be taught through a computer however, one argument can be that college students are already taking online classes and in that case computers have already replaced college professors to a certain extent. So by con's own admission the resolution has been affirmed pro that computers can indeed replace human teachers for that reason alone pro already wins this debate but lets pretend i don't for the sake of making this debate longer and more entertaining. Teachers on the other hand do not have all these skills but they can instil moral discipline in children computers on the other hand cannot do this teachers who are humans can use some illustrations which the child can easily understand many schools cannot also afford the cost of buying and maintaining computers. Debate on “should computers replace teachers” this is the first argument that i would like to give against the motion i agree that some aspects of the educational system are already provided by the computer and yes, it is definitely true that you don’t need a person to learn everything – education is a largely personal matter.
Should computers replace teachers i think thay should because computers are more fun to play with the point is clear that computers can store more data than a teacher 6 years now with this point ,the debate is clearly over even teachers take the help of the computers to teach us with more innovationaren't they doing so so it was a. The argument that teachers cannot be replaced by computers is strengthened if you believe teachers are much more than lectures a good teacher can inspire creativity, serving as caregiver and mentor there are countless schools where the internet is only instrumental in the teaching of critical thinking, and are therefore immune to the technology onslaught.
Should computers replace teachers i think thay should because computers are more fun to play with yes side score: 4 points here are some things that a teacher can do, but computers can't now with this point ,the debate is clearly over even teachers take the help of the computers to teach us with more innovationaren't they doing. I got chosen in a debate and i am on the side yes, computer can replace teachers i got a few points but tht's not enoughplease give your answer in points.
Debate about should robots replace teachers: wunnah or over my dead body sign up | login should robots replace teachers should robots and computers teach students instead of teachers robots will surely be a powerful tool in education just like pencils, books, computers, and the internet are, but total replacement would be absurd. Computers have a very good memory therefore they can teach us correctly in the opposite our teachers seemingly forget some points and are not able to answer all questions that we ask computer again can replace the presence of teacher and give us more values in studying moreover computers always were updated to new things. Robots will surely be a powerful tool in education just like pencils, books, computers, and the internet are, but total replacement would be absurd while robots will hopefully eliminate much of the need for human teachers, there will and should be human teachers for as long as humanity exists.